If we apply Occam's razor on the origin of life, consciousness, and singularity of the Big Bang, does it essentially support God, as the idea of God creating them would have fewer assumptions?

It might. It’s largely a matter of perspective. Of course, the physicists will disagree, because, God is not their thing! This gets into the broader point that scientific methods don’t really work very well, including the concept of Occam’s Razor. I would argue, actually, that there is no real scientific method, and that the concept of a scientific method is merely a method of rationalizing the bureaucratic incompetence of professional scientists by saying what their doing is good, no matter how useless it is, because they’re using the “scientific method”. https://www.quora.com/Throughout-history-real-progress-in-science-and-technology-has-always-been-unpredictable-and-haphazard-with-no-rhyme-reason-or-method-at-all-Therefore-there-is-no-scientific-method-Is-that-really-so-hard-tohttps://www.quora.com/Isnt-the-only-reason-that-scientists-are-so-adamant-about-the-existence-of-a-scientific-method-simply-that-if-there-is-no-scientific-method-then-their-training-is-totally-useless-and-so-are-they https://www.quora.com/If-we-apply-Occams-razor-on-the-origin-of-life-consciousness-and-singularity-of-the-Big-Bang-does-it-essentially-support-God-as-the-idea-of-God-creating-them-would-have-fewer-assumptions