Random Quote Generator

THE POET AS SCIENTIST

THE POET AS SCIENTIST, THE POET AS SCIENTIST

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

The Geek's Raven
[An excerpt, with thanks to Marcus Bales]

Once upon a midnight dreary,
fingers cramped and vision bleary,
System manuals piled high and wasted paper on the floor,
Longing for the warmth of bedsheets,
Still I sat there, doing spreadsheets:
Having reached the bottom line,
I took a floppy from the drawer.
Typing with a steady hand, I then invoked the SAVE command
But got instead a reprimand: it read "Abort, Retry, Ignore".

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

Form input - by Günter Born

Tuesday, September 06, 2022

How practical is it to convert one element to another using a neutron source?

I understand this is indeed done at times. I believe that Bismuth can be converted to Polonium when bombarded by a neutron source. On the other hand, it appears clear that neutron sources aren't exactly the Philosopher's Stone, currently. We don't seem to be able to convert lead to gold cheaply, en masse, using neutron sources, for example. If so, gold would be a lot cheaper than it is, obviously. So, what exactly are the limits of our abilities to use neutron sources to convert one element to another? How expensive is it? How dangerous is it? How practical is it, in general? Are there any approaches which might make the neutron source more closely approximate the Alchemist's ideal, the Philosopher's Stone -- not just to convert lead into gold, but any element into any other element we choose, cheaply, and in large quantities? Thoughts?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home