Random Quote Generator

THE POET AS SCIENTIST

THE POET AS SCIENTIST, THE POET AS SCIENTIST

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

The Geek's Raven
[An excerpt, with thanks to Marcus Bales]

Once upon a midnight dreary,
fingers cramped and vision bleary,
System manuals piled high and wasted paper on the floor,
Longing for the warmth of bedsheets,
Still I sat there, doing spreadsheets:
Having reached the bottom line,
I took a floppy from the drawer.
Typing with a steady hand, I then invoked the SAVE command
But got instead a reprimand: it read "Abort, Retry, Ignore".

Free JavaScripts provided
by The JavaScript Source

Form input - by Günter Born

Monday, July 11, 2022

Why do we need a distinct subspecialty of Theoretical Physics?

All sciences use theories and models. Some of these theories and models have limited very specialized application within the field, some have extremely broad implications -- e.g., Darwin's Theory of Evolution in Biology, Freud's psychosexual theories in psychology and psychiatry, Karl Marx's Dialectical Materialism in Economics, Quantum Mechanical electronic orbital analyses in Chemistry. However, Physics would appear to be the only science in which Theoretical analyses are given the distinction of being a unique subspecialty in which professionals make a career of specifically, and exclusively developing theory as an end in itself, and as a means of advancing knowledge of natural science in itself, with or without experimental justification or foundation. Why is this the case? Why is it necessary? Why should the objects of study for physicists require and/or benefit from theoretical analysis in the absence of experimental foundation more than in any other science?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home